Plain language summary
Numerous studies have provided evidence that the intestinal microbiota has a key role in the interface between dietary factors and host biology and that overweight, diabetes and liver steatosis, which are known to depend on dietary factors, are associated with alterations in the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a probiotic and synbiotic strains on traits of metabolic syndrome, which is driven by low-grade inflammation. This study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled design with three parallel arms. A total of 180 female and male overweight individuals aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Results showed that: - the probiotic resulted in significant improvements in the primary parameter, body fat mass; body weight; body mass index; waist circumference; waist-to-height ratio; visceral adipose tissue and in liver steatosis grade, as assessed with sonography. - the synbiotic resulted in better outcomes in visceral adipose tissue and liver steatosis grade, as assessed with sonography, and in reduction in constipation. - the count of viable lactobacilli was lower in the synbiotic test product than in the probiotic test product Authors concluded that the probiotic mixture and the synbiotic improved the parameters associated with overweight.
Abstract
L. fermentum strains K7-Lb1, K8-Lb1 and K11-Lb3 were found to suppress Th1 and Th2 response and to enhance defensin release by enterocytes, respectively. Based on these anti-inflammatory actions, we investigated the effect of these strains on traits of metabolic syndrome, which is driven by low-grade inflammation. In a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with three parallel arms, 180 individuals with abdominal overweight were administered for 3 months with (1) placebo; (2) probiotic, comprising L. fermentum strains; or (3) synbiotic, comprising the strains + acacia gum (10 g daily). The effects were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks and post hoc tests (Holm-Sidak and Dunn's tests). The alteration (∆) in body fat mass (kg) (primary parameter) during intervention was significantly (p = 0.039) more pronounced in the Probiotic group (-0.61 ± 1.94; mean ± SD) compared with the Placebo group (+0.13 ± 1.64). Accordingly, differences were found in ∆ body weight (p = 0.012), BMI (p = 0.011), waist circumference (p = 0.03), waist-to-height ratio (p = 0.033), visceral adipose tissue (SAD) (p < 0.001) and liver steatosis grade (LSG) (p < 0.001), as assessed using sonography. In the Synbiotic group, ∆SAD (p = 0.002), ∆LSG (p < 0.001) and ∆constipation score (p = 0.009) were improved compared with Placebo. The probiotic mixture and the synbiotic improved the parameters associated with overweight.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
5
Allocation concealment
:
Yes
